Post by account_disabled on Dec 7, 2023 7:07:10 GMT
What he wrote about a certain flattening of titles is true. After all, I too have read and continue to read posts with the same titles. I tried to Google "How to make money online" and I found lots of the same and similar titles. The variations are insignificant: “how to make money online”, “how to earn on the internet”, etc. Titles like that promise nothing. To make money online there is only one way: create a serious project on the web and work. In this case, rather than writing rules, even if they have been respected, I would talk about magnetic or sensationalist titles. And I'm talking about it now.
Sensationalist Headlines: Do They Always Work? The example shown by the reader is real: I have come across titles like this several times and then been disappointed because the blogger proved himself Phone Number Data wrong from the first paragraph. This is a mistake you should never make, because the risk is losing readers rather than winning them over. Sensationalist headlines - if we want to call them that - are typical of evergreen posts , always valid contents that, they say, users really like. Certainly evergreen posts are magnetic articles, because they aim to solve problems, such as the aforementioned "how to earn online". So can a sensationalist headline work? It works if the post that follows keeps the same promises expressed by the title, otherwise it's a simple scam.
As Fabrizio Urdis wrote to me in a comment on last week's post: To explain myself better on the internet you can find posts like this: “How to change your life in seven days” and the first thing you read is “Obviously this post won't change your life…” But not you, if for example you write 150+ ideas... it doesn't even cross your mind to put 147, you put 152! (There were 154 ideas , but this time I forgive you A few days ago a friend of mine sent me on Skype the link to a very long article in English, entitled “How to create a content strategy (in just 652 steps)”. Well, in the post I didn't find the number 652, but not even the number 100. It was a witty title, as if to say that there were many... Anglo-Saxon humor that I didn't get.
Sensationalist Headlines: Do They Always Work? The example shown by the reader is real: I have come across titles like this several times and then been disappointed because the blogger proved himself Phone Number Data wrong from the first paragraph. This is a mistake you should never make, because the risk is losing readers rather than winning them over. Sensationalist headlines - if we want to call them that - are typical of evergreen posts , always valid contents that, they say, users really like. Certainly evergreen posts are magnetic articles, because they aim to solve problems, such as the aforementioned "how to earn online". So can a sensationalist headline work? It works if the post that follows keeps the same promises expressed by the title, otherwise it's a simple scam.
As Fabrizio Urdis wrote to me in a comment on last week's post: To explain myself better on the internet you can find posts like this: “How to change your life in seven days” and the first thing you read is “Obviously this post won't change your life…” But not you, if for example you write 150+ ideas... it doesn't even cross your mind to put 147, you put 152! (There were 154 ideas , but this time I forgive you A few days ago a friend of mine sent me on Skype the link to a very long article in English, entitled “How to create a content strategy (in just 652 steps)”. Well, in the post I didn't find the number 652, but not even the number 100. It was a witty title, as if to say that there were many... Anglo-Saxon humor that I didn't get.
